Ringling College of Art & Design’s David Houle, Futurist in Residence, and Tim Rumage, Professor of Environmental Studies, are the co-founders of ThisSpaceShipEarth.org, and co-authors of This Spaceship Earth.
They teamed once again to produce, with the help of local citizens, a short video of where the high-tide line would be as the sea level rises. They chose to illustrate this on Siesta Beach, consistently listed as one of the top ten beaches worldwide.
Join this organization to become more involved with your local politicians with regards to sea level rise, global warming and other environmental issues
Citizens’ Climate Lobby–please go to this web site below citizensclimatelobby.org
Temperature data for 2016 shows it is likely to have edged ahead of 2015 as the world’s warmest year.
Data from Nasa and the UK Met Office shows temperatures were about 0.07 degrees Celsius above the 2015 mark.
Although the Met Office increase was within the margin of error, Nasa says that 2016 was the third year in a row to break the record.
The El Niño weather phenomenon played a role, say scientists, but the main factor was human emissions of CO2.
The latest conclusions won’t come as a much of a shock to observers, as the likely outcome was trailed heavily towards the end of last year.
What is climate change?
So warm was the early part of 2016 – influenced by a powerful El Niño – that some leading climate scientists were predicting as early as May that a new record was probable.
During an El Niño, a band of unusually warm ocean water develops in parts of the Pacific. The phenomenon affects the climate globally, disrupting weather patterns.
According to Nasa figures, 2016 is now the warmest year in a record that dates back to 1880.
“2015 has been the warmest year on record up until now, so 2016 has just beaten that and and it’s beaten that by about 0.1-0.12 of a degree Celsius, which doesn’t seem like a lot, but in terms of the year-to-year variations it’s actually huge,” Dr Gavin Schmidt from Nasa told BBC News.
“This is a very clear record that we’re seeing. It is driven mainly by changes in the tropical Pacific where we had an El Niño event that produced a lot of warmth. But we’ve also seen long-term trends in warming mostly due to the increasing greenhouse gases.”
Another factor that has affected temperatures in 2016 is the unusual warmth in the Arctic.
The sea-ice covering the Arctic reached its second lowest level (in terms of extent) in September 2016. The sea-ice grows in autumn and winter and shrinks each spring and summer.
While the sea-ice extent last year didn’t break the record, the mercury stayed high and the smaller amount of ice now present in the region is at unprecedented levels for the time of year.
A number of meteorological agencies from around the world all released their figures on Wednesday. They all suggest that warming in 2016 was a record that had an important contribution from El Niño.
The Met Office says it contributed about 0.2C to the annual average for 2016. However, researchers believe that while this is substantial, it is not the whole story.
“We understand the contribution El Niño makes fairly well and we’ve seen it many times,” said Prof Ellie Highwood from the University of Reading.
“But even if you take that contribution away, we would expect 2015 and 2016 to still be the warmest years we’ve seen, so a majority of it is coming from global warming and the greenhouse effect.”
The World Meteorological Organization (WMO), which pulls together temperature data from a number of sources, agrees that 2016 broke the record by 0.07C.
Not all of the reports on temperature data in 2016 are clear that the warmest-year record has been broken. Century dominated by records
The Met Office says that 2016 was 0.77 above the long-term rate, but with a plus or minus error margin of 0.1C, meaning that last year was at the very least, one of the two warmest years on record.
“The final figures confirm that 2016 was yet another extremely warm year,” said Peter Stott from the Met Office.
“The temperature for last year was very close to the year before, temperatures for 2016 exceeding those for 2015 by a small margin.”
Regardless of the small margins, when the new data on 2016 is included, 15 of the warmest 16 years on record have now occurred since 2001.
According to Noaa (the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), the only year from the 20th Century to break into the top 16 is 1998, and which ranks seventh warmest.
This prolonged period of warming was having significant impacts around the world.
“We have also broken sea-ice minimum records in the Arctic and Antarctic,” said Petteri Taalas from the WMO.
“The Arctic is warming twice as fast as the global average. The persistent loss of sea-ice is driving weather, climate and ocean circulation patterns in other parts of the world. We also have to pay attention to the potential release of methane from melting permafrost,” he said.
Of great concern to scientists and politicians is the fact that the newly published temperature data shows the Earth is once again more than one degree warmer than pre-industrial times, and edging closer to the threshold of 1.5C set under the Paris climate pact.
With the Trump administration about to take office in the US, there are concerns that political support for climate action might fade. This would be a big mistake according to scientists. “Climate change is one of the great challenges of the 21st Century and shows no signs of slowing down,” said Prof Mark Maslin, from University College London.
“The decarbonisation of the global economy is the ultimate goal to prevent the worst effects of climate change. The hottest year on record is such a clear warning siren that even President-elect Trump cannot ignore it.”
Researchers say that 2017 is unlikely to break the warming record but will be in the top five hottest years.
“As our beautiful blue planet continues to spin deep in space, we humans down here on the ground are grappling with whether or not climate change is within our control. Meanwhile, the carbon clock is rapidly ticking away.” Check out this article written by Kathryn Thomsen posted here: http://hundredgivers.org/2016/12/19/carbon-clock-ticking-away/
Alasdair Wilkins
Brendan Smialowski/Getty Images
December 19, 2016
Nothing imperils humanity’s future like global warming, and that very fact may help explain why conservatives are generally so skeptical of climate science.
After all, conservatism first emerged as a defense of tradition against progressive change, so why would conservatives care about preserving a future they already view with suspicion? That’s the argument a recent study puts forward, and it points to a possible better way to talk about the environment with those skeptical of climate science.
Although 97 percent of climate scientists agree that the Earth is getting hotter and human activity is a primary cause, the public is far more divided. A recent Pew Research poll was just the latest of dozens of polls to demonstrate the profound partisan split on climate issues, with 70 percent of liberal Democrats saying they trusted climate scientists compared with just 15 percent of conservative Republicans. And so-called climate change deniers will soon hold pretty much all the power in the United States, with Donald Trump set to become the only head of state on the planet who rejects climate science. If ever there was a time for a renewed effort to change the minds of conservatives — if not Trump, then at least friends and family who voted him in — about climate change, the time is now.
Researchers at Germany’s University of Cologne ran a series of online surveys with a range of 200 to 300 American participants from across the political spectrum. They worked on the assumption that conservatism has historically been about preserving the traditional status quo in the face of change, whereas liberals tend to see such change as necessary to building a better tomorrow. In other words, conservatives look fondly on the past and are wary of the future, with the situation reversed for liberals. Calls for dealing with climate change that are rooted in protecting the planet for future generations might then not be persuasive to conservatives, particularly when they associate such environmental messages with liberal efforts to change society for the worse.
Are these broad generalizations? Absolutely. But broad generalizations can be useful, and the results from the surveys seem to bear out the researchers’ hypothesis. In one survey, the participants would see one of two nearly identical messages. While one talked about how “there is increasing traffic on the road, the air is becoming polluted, and land is disappearing,” the other noted how, in the past, “there was less traffic on the road, the air was clean, and there was plenty of land.” One talked about wanting to make future generations proud, while the other worried about doing right by the founding fathers.
Conservative participants consistently liked the past-focused message better than the forward-looking ones. Liberal participants somewhat preferred the future-centric messages, but they generally responded positively to pro-environmental messages of any stripe. They found that switching the focus of global warming messaging towards the past was enough to erase 77 percent of the opinion gap between liberals and conservatives.
Best Weather’s Jim Roemer weighs in on the warm winter in a large part of the U.S. and its impact on energy prices.
He speaks on “Bloomberg Markets.” (Source: Bloomberg)
HELPING YOU MAKE THE BEST INVESTMENT DECISIONS BASED ON THE WEATHER
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.
